Amazon Mobile Application

Redesign Amazon Application Interface

Project Summary

Results

System usability scale rating increased from grade F (awful) to grade B (good) for the new design

Role

UX designer

Things Done

User research and interviews, User journey map, Competitor analysis, Low-fidelity wireframe, High-fidelity prototype, Usability testing

Project Client

Amazon (School project)

Tools Used

Figma, Miro

Team

UX/UI Designers

Introduction


Keypoint: A platform where user can find and discover anything

Amazon was founded on July 1994, with a mission to strive to offer our customers the lowest possible prices, the best available selection, and the utmost convenience, and a vision to be Earth's most customer-centric company, where customers can find and discover anything they might want to buy online.

Design Process


Design Process for Amazon Mobile App

Desk Research


Keypoint: User group age is around 25 - 34 years old (51% male)

According to Janio Asia (2019), the profile of Singapore's online shoppers is mostly working adults in the range between 25 and 34 years old, with a slight majority towards men (51%). An analysis was also done on the different mobile playstores (Apple Store and Google Play Store), and some common problems found were:

  1. Unable to find filters
  2. Filter not accurate
  3. Navigating difficulties
  4. Too much advertisement

Desk Research Data

Contextual Inquiry


Keypoint: The current design is rated "awful" in the SUS survey result

During the contextual inquiry, a System Usability Scale (SUS) assessment was also done to find out how usable the users found the current app. The users were asked 10 different questions and were asked to choose between a Likert scale of 5, with 1 being "strongly disagree" and 5 being "strongly agree". The answers were then input into a formula to tabulate the overall SUS score for each individual interviewee. The average was tabulated to have a better overview of the overall SUS score of the 5 interviewees on the current app. The 10 questions in the SUS survey are:

  1. I think that I would like to use this system frequently
  2. I found the system unnecessarily complex
  3. I thought the system was easy to use
  4. I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this system
  5. I found the various functions in this system were well integrated
  6. I thought there was too much inconsistency in this system
  7. I would imagine that most people would learn to use this system very quickly
  8. I found the system very cumbersome to use
  9. I felt very confident using the system
  10. I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this system

SUS Average Score Result

Problem Statement


Keypoint: Users have difficulties navigating, searching, and applying the information they have found, this result in a high-dropoff rate and lose in sales. We need to help provide user a seamless way find and discover the things they want.

The issues were then grouped into four different categories using affinity diagramming, namely, homepage, categories, filters, and vouchers. The main problem that is identified is that users have difficulties navigating, searching, and applying the information they find.

Main Problem with Current App

Jobs-to-be-done


To make the problem statement more user-focused (goals user want to achieve through using Amazon app), it is being reframed as "jobs-to-be-done".

Jobs-to-be-done

Persona and User Journey Map


Keypoint: "Wandering customer" persona

Based on the data (4 out of 5 users have such usage pattern) and assumptions, a persona that reflects a "wandering customer" has been created. She is someone who likes to randomly browse around on an ecommerce app from time to time during her spare time and loves to see new products or brands, but she keeps meeting roadblocks while doing so on the Amazon shopping app.

Persona - Annabelle

User Journey Map - Annabelle

Analysis of Similar Products


Keypoint: Getting inspiration from top ecommerce apps in Singapore

After analysing Singapore's top-two e-commerce application, some components and arrangements could be applied back to the Amazon shopping app, as users would be more familiar with how the different things are arranged, categorized, and look.

Lazada and Shopee App

Analysis of Current App


Keypoint: Issues with the current app design (home page, category page, and product page)

Different pages that appear in the user journey have been scrutinized and broken down into smaller components for analysis (as each page is filled with numerous different components).

Home page

Two main issue to address on home page:

  1. Repeated functions
    • 8 different types of grouping formats that Amazon uses that are repeated throughout the homepage, namely, scroll navigation, 1-item, 2-items, 6-items, 9-items grid, 2 types of 4-items grid and a 3-rows display with different types of function grouping from different categories placed into the different grouping formats
    • Repeating of the same function group throughout the same page (as shown in Table 1)
  2. Confusing horizontal scrolling navigation
    • Not sure what each items on the navigation means
    • Not sure why there is 2 horizontal scrolling navigation and the difference between them

Different Groupings in Home page

Functions for the Different Grouping

Horizontal Scroll Navigation in Current App

Category page

Similar to home page, category page also have the issue of too many repeated functions throughout the same page.

Repeated Functions in Category page

Product page

There are two main issue to address on product page:

  1. Repeated functions
    • Similar to the other two pages, this issue is found on the product page
  2. Unfamiliar 'add to cart' button location
    • Unconventional placement of 'add to cart' button

Repeated Functions and 'Add to Cart' Button in Product page

Brand Personality


Keypoint: A trustworthy, inviting, organised, and modern app

In the redesign of the brand personality, the brand colours were kept, as the colours still help with instilling the personality that the company should portray, which is being trustworthy, inviting, organised, and modern. Below are some additional changes made to the new design to further enhance those personality qualities:

  1. Trustworthy
    • Usage of blue more widely throughout the app as it is the colour that signifies trust and faith.
  2. Inviting
    • Rounded edges are used for the different components to make them feel more pleasurable for the users.
  3. Organised
    • More clearly defined sections for each page
  4. Modern
    • More spacing, curvature design, and images were added to make the app look more modern.

Trustworthy and Inviting Design Consideration

UI Style Guide


Keypoint: Enhanced branding and redesign of icons

To ensure familiarity with the app, the typeface and colour palette have been kept the same. The two things that were done differently were:

  1. Used branding colour more widely throughout the app
  2. Redesign of icons (tested with users' mental models)

Before and After Branding Colours Applied more Widely

New Icons Design

Prototyping


Keypoint: Solving the 7 issues with current design

There are seven different issues that the prototype aims to solve, namely

  1. Reduction of similar sections
  2. Easy discovery of the voucher
  3. Removal of sub-categories
  4. Easy to locate and use the filter function
  5. Prioritising the reviews section
  6. Enhance product discovery through pop-up banners
  7. Relocation of "add to cart" and "buy now" buttons

1. Reduction of similar section

According to Hick's law, the increased number of options increases the time taken for the user to make a decision. Hence, the solution is to reduce the number of similar functions on the page, which will reduce the number of options and also reduce the page length. Below is a summary of the reduced sections:

Overview of Reduced Sections on the 3 Pages

Before and After Section Reduction (Home page)

2. Easy discovery of the voucher

Due to the unobtrusive icon, lengthy instructions for claiming, and dispersed nature of the vouchers in the current design, the voucher is difficult to find and use.The solution is to put the vouchers at a location that the user is already familiar with (took inspiration from Lazada and Shopee).

Vouchers Design on Current App

Suggested Design for Vouchers Section

3. Removal of sub-categories

In the current design, the categories have similar designs and naming conventions as products; hence, users get confused. As having sub-categories is an unfamiliar experience for the users, it is completely removed in the new design.

Sub-category Flow in Current Design

Before and After Removal of Sub-category

4. Easy to locate and use the filter function

The current filter is hidden within the hamburger menu, which is unconventional for an e-commerce app. In addition, the filter options are not precise and disappear when the user goes down a few pages. In the new design, the filtering is being removed and placed in the top-right corner (usually where the filter is found). A more precise filtering option has also been added, and the user can now see if the filter is still being applied to the page.

Relocation of Filter Button and more Precise Filtering Options

Filtered Options Appearing on Page

5. Prioriting the reviews section

Because the review section is an important section that most users look for (all 5 interviewees looked for it upon reaching the product page), the new design shifted it up where it can be easily found and viewed upon loading the product page.

Before and After Relocation of Reviews Section

6. Enhance product discovery through pop-up banner

As the target persona in this study is the wandering customer, a pop-up banner page upon loading the app would help in product or event discovery, which can lead to a higher conversion rate.

Pop-up Banner Design

7. Relocation of 'add to cart' and 'buy now' buttons

The current design is placed in an unconventional location on the page and disappears upon scrolling. Hence, the solution is to make the "add to cart" and "buy now" buttons sticky at the bottom of the page.

Before and After Design for the 'Add to Cart' Buttons

User Testing


Keypoint: Testing navigation and filter function of prototype

The prototype is being tested with three different users. Each of the users was given the task of browsing and purchasing a smartwatch within a given price range without using the search bar. This is to test if the user can find the filter function easily and navigate with ease to the desired product.

User Testing Task, Scenario, and Feedback

Revised Prototype


Keypoint: Added more default filtering options, increased banner size, and added a more precise filtering option

After consolidating and considering the user feedback from the user testing, there were 3 main changes made to the prototype:

  1. Having more Default Filtering Options
    • A user suggested including a filter to get the highest-rated product and the greatest number of buyers of the product. By having this filter, it can help persuade a user to purchase the product, as the user can now see how many others actually like the product and have bought it. This is due to the "bandwagon effect", where people have the tendency to adopt a behaviour because other people are doing it (social proof, a persuasion technique).
  2. Increased Size of Pop-up Banner
    • A user also mentioned that the banner is too small and did not catch much attention. According to the scale principle in visual hierarchy design, larger elements stand out more and attract users' attention. Thus, the banner size was increased by 25%, which may help increase the discovery and conversion of our users.
  3. More Precise Filtering Options
    • A user mentioned that he would like to have an even more precise filter function in the filter modal; hence, the new design included a "by features" option where one can filter by the different features of a product.

More Default Filtering Option

Increased Banner Size

Filter by Features

Usability Comparison


Keypoint: SUS grade B for prototype design and Grade F for current design

During the user testing, another SUS survey is being done to gauge the usability of the new design and the current design. The same task was also conducted on the current app design versus the prototype to compare the time taken to complete the task on each design. A comparison is being done between the current app and the prototype; below is the result:

Current App VS Prototype Comparison

Conclusion


Solved the jobs to be done by shortening the pages through the removal of repetitive sections, having a better location and function for voucher, filter, review, and 'add to cart' and 'buy now', more relatable and obvious icons, and a strengthened branding and personality.

Summary of New Improvements and Laws Applied

Reflection


It would be helpful to get data such as heatmaps, customer profiles, the conversion rate for different visits, and how long they spent on the site. As this would help better identify more issues with the current application.

Test the Prototype


Please scan the QR code or click on the link to access the prototype. *Contact me if you cannot access the prototype.

×